Skip to main content

Privacy Pulse

Every week I scan Canada’s privacy regulators and the commentators I trust, and pull the stories that actually matter for practitioners. Below are the headlines with short excerpts and links to the originals — plus my own “Why it matters” notes on the stories worth a second look. I refresh this page weekly; the full stories always live with their publishers.

Updated: 2026-09-2132 stories · 4 sources

BC OIPC — News and Events

Visit source →

BC OIPC — Rulings and Reports

Visit source →
  • Park Village Mobile Home Park

    Two individuals (the complainants) complained that Park Village Mobile Home Park (Park Village), which operates a manufactured home park where the complainants live, was collecting their personal information via video…

    Why it matters: A textbook PIPA s.6 case: cameras collecting personal information without authority, ordered removed and deleted. If your organization runs video surveillance, this is the decision I point clients to first.

    BC OIPC — Rulings and Reports · Sep 14, 2026 · Read the original →

  • Cariboo Regional District

    The Cariboo Regional District (the District) requested authorization under s. 43 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act to disregard an individual’s (the respondent’s) outstanding and future access…

    BC OIPC — Rulings and Reports · Sep 4, 2026 · Read the original →

  • Adjudication Under Section 62 of the Act Requested by A.P. on 29 December 2025

    Adjudication Under Section 62 of the Act Requested by A.P. on 29 December 2025

    BC OIPC — Rulings and Reports · Sep 3, 2026 · Read the original →

  • Vancouver Coastal Health Authority

    An applicant asked for records about herself from the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (Health Authority) under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA). The Health Authority identified…

    BC OIPC — Rulings and Reports · Sep 3, 2026 · Read the original →

  • City of Coquitlam

    An applicant requested the total legal costs incurred by the City of Coquitlam (the City) in its appeal of certain orders made by the BC Utilities Commission. The City withheld the information under s. 14…

    BC OIPC — Rulings and Reports · Sep 2, 2026 · Read the original →

  • City of Richmond

    An applicant requested the total legal fees incurred by the City of Richmond (the City) in the City’s appeals of certain orders and decisions of the BC Utilities Commission. The City refused to disclose this…

    BC OIPC — Rulings and Reports · Sep 1, 2026 · Read the original →

  • City of Salmon Arm

    Under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA), an individual (applicant) asked the City of Salmon Arm (City) for access to information related to a wildfire interface covenant registered on the…

    BC OIPC — Rulings and Reports · Aug 31, 2026 · Read the original →

  • The Board of Education of School District 08 (Kootenay Lake)

    An applicant made an access request under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA). The request was for records related to himself and his children. The Board of Education of School District 08…

    BC OIPC — Rulings and Reports · Aug 31, 2026 · Read the original →

Michael Geist

Visit source →
Visit source →